PheroTalk

PheroTalk

The World's Largest Pheromone Community

Get Real Pheromones directly from Androtics Pheromone Research at the SmartMones Pheromone Store

Questions about pheromones?
Get Fast, Friendly, No-Obligation Help from Real People at the Pheromone Hotline.
Call 1-800-671-6464 in the USA, or +01 425-786-2001 Internationally

Latest Threads ::.. a lot of talk about a314 Pheromone Seekers Hello everyone :) What mix/pheromone would mimic NoFap/NoMasturbation? Hey from Florida newbie Best Post Of The Week 46, November, 2017 A314YE vs A314 Rev.32 Greetings from MEA. Pheromones to Aid Tantric Yoga? M/40 What to use for escorts/ erotic masseurs? hello. Pheromones for Edge @ Work and Spice @ Dating? m/27/AfroAmerican


Go Back   PheroTalk > Discussion > Pheromone Theory

Register Invite Your Friends FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read
Old July 29th, 2017, 08:40 AM   #1
datadragon Male
Changed status to single
  
 
datadragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Right Behind You. No, the other side
Posts: 39
Thanks: 9
Thanked 24 Times in 18 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation: 33
datadragon is on a distinguished road
Default How pheromones are detected. VNO not involved in processing of putative pheromones

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3607301/

This study was designed to answer the question about the VNO involvement in human processing of putative pheromones Androstadienone and EST (female A1 equivalent). The study shows that the human VNO has no function in perception and processing of putative pheromones, they worked as usual without the VNO. There was no difference between subjects with and without a detectable VNO in Androstadienone perception. Functional occlusion (complete blocking) of the VNO did not change the pattern of brain activation after exposure with Androstadienone so it was working even when the VNO was not accessible. Functional occlusion of the VNO also did not alter the perception of or sensitivity to A1 .

In another case, The patients suffered from severe nasal polyposis, which prevented odor molecules to reach the olfactory cleft, therefore the main olfactory epithelium, and which rendered patients anosmic (unable to smell). However, the VNO, which is located much more further back, was not affected. Savic et al. observed activations of the hypothalamus after stimulation with estratetraenol ( EST ), the female counterpart of AND ( A1 ); in the control group but not in the patient group who could not smell due to the nasal blockage.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...MC3607301/#R49 [Savic et al., 2009]. They interpreted these results as a proof that putative human pheromones are perceived via the main normal olfactory epithelium.

This means that those who couldnt smell through their normal olfactory epithelium did not get the response from EST which shows it works via the normal olfactory system. And further, even though the VNO was accessible there was no response, which also shows that isnt involved at least with A1 and EST ..

Chemosignals in humans are probably processed via the main olfactory system based on that information alone, and in the above link mentions the other possibilities:
Although the Grueneberg ganglion, an anatomical structure located at the anterior portion of the nostril, was recently demonstrated to act as a pheromonal receptor organ for fear odors in rodents https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...PMC3607301/#R6 [Brechbuhl et al., 2008] and may therefore be a candidate for having vomeronasal functions in humans; tentative evidence indicates that in humans the functions of the VNOmight have migrated to the main olfactory system. So, a vomeronasal receptor gene that in rodents is expressed in the VNO is in humans expressed in the olfactory mucosa https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...MC3607301/#R45 [Rodriguez et al., 2000].

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14674834/. Knecht et al. [2003] measured sensitivity to the odor of androstenone, a steroid found in underarm sweat, before and after functionally occluding the VNO by covering its duct with a latex patch. Functional occlusion of the VNO did not change participants? perception of androstenone or that of a nonendogenous control odor.

...Going to church doesn't make you religeous any more then standing in a garage makes you a car..

Last edited by datadragon; November 4th, 2017 at 03:52 AM.
datadragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
vanadium (November 8th, 2017)
Reply
1 Active User(s) Viewing This Topic (0 members and 1 guests):  

Tags
androstadienone , human , involved , processing , putative , vno


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The human VNO: Going, Going, Gone jvkohl Pheromone Theory 5 July 19th, 2011 05:29 PM
From the human VNO gang jvkohl Studies & Abstracts 9 January 5th, 2009 10:12 PM
Putative human pheromones and preferences of some MTF transsexuals jvkohl Studies & Abstracts 9 November 30th, 2008 05:14 AM
excited to get involved! gogogopiggy WOMEN's Pheromone Advice, Tips and Tricks 1 September 22nd, 2008 06:41 AM
Putative human pheromones and MtFtransssexuals jvkohl Studies & Abstracts 1 August 5th, 2008 01:06 PM

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +3. The time now is 10:43 PM.


©2004-2017 PheromoneTalk.com
(c) 2002-2015 Androtics Pheromone Research All Rights Reserved Internationally
Page generated in 0.11611 seconds with 19 queries